A common underlying proficiency exists for print knowledge, and it accounted for more variance than for phonological awareness, contrary to the authors' hypothesis¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The bifactor model fit better than the two-factor model for print knowledge, and the general factor accounted for approximately 79% of variance in total print knowledge scores. → Goodrich J. Marc 2017
Evidence¶
Goodrich J. Marc 2017¶
Goodrich J. Marc, Lonigan Christopher J. (2017). Language-Independent and Language-Specific Aspects of Early Literacy: An Evaluation of the Common Underlying Proficiency Model. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000179
q3 · i? · associational · r3
Omega statistics from the bifactor print knowledge model in the sample of 858 preschoolers; "approximately 79% of variance in total print knowledge scores was due to the General factor". The two-factor correlation was r = .61, p < .001.
"Omega statistics indicated that approximately 79% of variance in total print knowledge scores was due to the General factor, approximately 17% was due to the Spanish factor, and approximately 3% was due to the English factor."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Spanish-speaking language-minority preschoolers show a common underlying proficiency for phonological awareness, with bifactor models fitting better than correlated-factors models — related
- Spanish phonological awareness items loaded more strongly on the general factor than English items, while English print knowledge items loaded more strongly than Spanish items — related
- Language-independent phonological awareness and print knowledge factors relate to each other and to language-specific early literacy factors, suggesting a general language-learning capacity — a broader claim this one bears on
- No common underlying proficiency emerges for oral language: bifactor models of expressive and definitional vocabulary did not converge — related
- Higher order cognitive skills (inference, perspective taking, comprehension monitoring) fit a bifactor structure with a general cross-language factor and language-specific factors in English and Spanish — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
common-underlying-proficiency-print-knowledge |
title |
A common underlying proficiency exists for print knowledge, and it accounted for more variance than for phonological awareness, contrary to the authors' hypothesis |
description |
A common underlying proficiency exists for print knowledge, and it accounted for more variance than for phonological awareness, contrary to the authors' hypothesis |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — goodrich-j-marc-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.