Synchronous and asynchronous communication technologies are commonly employed to support communication between students, industry partners and teaching staff during WIL¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across the reviewed studies, synchronous technologies (e.g., video conferencing, Elluminate Live!) and asynchronous technologies (e.g., email, forums) were commonly used to support communication among WIL participants. → Schuster 2017
Evidence¶
Schuster 2017¶
Schuster, Lisa & Glavas, Charmaine (2017). Exploring the dimensions of electronic work integrated learning (eWIL). Educational Research Review, 21, pp. 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.04.001
q2 · i? · review · r2
Synthesis across the 22 reviewed studies: communication tools such as video conferencing, email and forums supported interaction between students, industry partners and teaching staff during WIL experiences (e.g., McNamara & Brown 2009; Goold & Augar 2009; Welch et al. 2012).
"Synchronous (e.g., video conferencing, Elluminate Live!) and asynchronous (e.g., email, forums) communication technologies were commonly employed in the studies examined to support communication between students, industry partners and teaching staff during WIL experiences"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Time zone differences affected international students' timely participation in asynchronous forums, and a balance of synchronous and asynchronous communication was regarded as beneficial — related
- Introductory face-to-face meetings are the dominant strategy for stimulating social interaction in blended learning — related
- Key challenges for eWIL include securing partner organizations, lack of support systems, software quality, staff training and equity of access — related
- Technology can remove geographical barriers and allow rural and external students to engage in WIL activities — related
- Technologies are used to assess student performance during WIL, commonly via online reflective journals and e-portfolios — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
communication-technologies-support-wil |
title |
Synchronous and asynchronous communication technologies are commonly employed to support communication between students, industry partners and teaching staff during WIL |
description |
Synchronous and asynchronous communication technologies are commonly employed to support communication between students, industry partners and teaching staff during WIL |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — schuster-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.