Technologies are used to assess student performance during WIL, commonly via online reflective journals and e-portfolios¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Several reviewed studies used technologies to assess students' performance during WIL, most commonly online reflective journals and e-portfolios. → Schuster 2017

Evidence¶

Schuster 2017¶

Schuster, Lisa & Glavas, Charmaine (2017). Exploring the dimensions of electronic work integrated learning (eWIL). Educational Research Review, 21, pp. 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.04.001

q2 · i? · review · r2

Synthesis of the reviewed studies' assessment uses of technology: online reflective journals and e-portfolios were the common forms; the review notes this is expected given research showing technology can successfully support reflection (Kori et al., 2014).

"Several other studies utilized technologies to assess students’ performance during WIL, commonly in the form of online reflective journals (e.g., Edgar, Francis-Coad, & Connaughton, 2013; Larkin & Beatson, 2014; Sheridan, Kotevski, & Dean, 2014) and e-portfolios (e.g., Kaider et al., 2009)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Synchronous and asynchronous communication technologies are commonly employed to support communication between students, industry partners and teaching staff during WIL — related
• Most eWIL research (15 of 22 reviewed studies) examines technology used backstage to support WIL processes rather than to deliver WIL — related
• Only 3 of 22 reviewed studies examine technology-blended delivery of WIL, and 4 examine fully technology-based WIL — related