Tatar-school teachers in course groups taught with communicatively developing methods scored higher than control groups on eight oral-speech characteristics, with no sample size or statistical test reported¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After 2-3 weeks of intensive course work, experimental groups of IAT course trainees showed higher percentages than control groups on eight oral-activity characteristics (from 48% vs 46% for information concentration to 82% vs 26% for logic connection of sentences); the authors read this as their speech having "improved greatly", but report no sample size, no pre-test and no statistical test. → Khairova and Egamberdieva 2016
Evidence¶
Khairova and Egamberdieva 2016¶
Irina V. Khairova & Nodira M. Egamberdieva. (2016). Communicatively Developing Technology of Speech Activation of Tatar Schools` Teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(4), 433-451. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094593
q2 · i? · causal · r1
A forming pedagogic experiment with control and experimental groups of IAT (advanced-training) course trainees in Tatarstan. Table 1 reports, for each of eight oral-activity characteristics, a percentage for the control groups and one for the experimental groups, e.g. logic connection of sentences 26% (control) against 82% (experimental), and sufficient information concentration 46% against 48%. These are between-group figures, not before-and-after measurements of the same group; the article gives no number of participants, says nothing of how groups were formed, and reports no statistical test. The authors conclude that "the quality of their speech improved greatly".
"As we can see the result of intensive influence (during 2 -3 weeks) on the IAT courses trainees` oral activity the quality of their speech improved greatly: pronunciation norms, as well as inter phrase connection, notional structure, syntactic complexity, information intensity, etc."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Communication Skills — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Baseline analysis of 600 teacher monologue utterances found most trainees made few mistakes, pointing to need for systematic work on oral text — related
- Group form of orthoepic practicum work is reported as better than frontal form for trainees' individual recording and collective activity — related
- Gains from an intensive period of second-language study persist for weeks without rehearsal. — related
- Intensive ESL learners' oral English development was examined in four intact classes of approximately 100 French-speaking students aged 10–12 after a 5-month course — related
- Trainee interviews indicated the phonics-oriented training improved EFL teachers' pronunciation, vocabulary and attitudes toward learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.