Group form of orthoepic practicum work is reported as better than frontal form for trainees' individual recording and collective activity¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The authors assert that group work on the orthoepic practicum better provides recording of trainees' individual peculiarities and greater opportunities for collective cognitive activity than frontal work. → Khairova and Egamberdieva 2016

Evidence¶

Khairova and Egamberdieva 2016¶

Irina V. Khairova & Nodira M. Egamberdieva. (2016). Communicatively Developing Technology of Speech Activation of Tatar Schools` Teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(4), 433-451. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094593

q1 · i? · causal · r1

The authors' interpretive assertion (type e) offered in the methods discussion, citing Gromova (2014); the article prints no comparative test or effect size for this contrast, only the claim that group activity contains "cross check and stimulation".

"The group form of work on the orthoepic practicum is better than frontal i n provision of the trainees individual peculiarities` recordings, grants greater opportunities for collective cognitive activity."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Collaboration — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Tatar-school teachers in course groups taught with communicatively developing methods scored higher than control groups on eight oral-speech characteristics, with no sample size or statistical test reported — related
• Collaborative Learning Improves Outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
• Cooperative Learning Improves Achievement — a broader claim this one bears on