Claims

Most of the 19 retained behaviour competencies originated from the PSI, RPS and SHPA frameworks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of the 19 behaviour competencies put forward for discursive analysis, most came from the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland framework, followed by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society hospital standards and the Australian shpaclinCAT tool. → Stoll J. T. 2024

Evidence

Stoll J. T. 2024

Stoll J. T., Böhmdorfer-McNair B., Jeske M., Weidmann A. E. (2024). Development and validation of a national clinical pharmacy competency framework for hospital pharmacists in Austria: a multi-method study. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01781-3

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive accounting of the sources of the 19 retained competencies in the mapping and discursive analysis section. The article reports "Most behaviour competencies (n = 7) originated from" the PSI framework, with five from the RPS and four from SHPA's shpaclinCAT version 2.

"Most behaviour competencies (n = 7) originated from the Core Competency Framework for Pharmacists published by the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI) [21], followed by five behaviour competencies of the professional standards for hospital pharmacy services by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of great Britain (RPS) (n = 5)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.