A computer-based implementation of the tutorial yields the lowest post-test scores, statistically lower on momentum than every other style in the same study and the prior study's ideal implementation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students in the computer-based implementation had statistically lower (p < 0.05) post-test momentum scores than any other style in the present study and the ideal implementation of the prior study, and their scores were the lowest of all implementations for both topics. → Slezak 2011
Evidence¶
Slezak 2011¶
Slezak, C., Koenig, K. M., Endorf, R. J., & Braun, G. A. (2011). Investigating the Effectiveness of the Tutorials in Introductory Physics in Multiple Instructional Settings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0050 doi:10.48550/arxiv.1110.0050
q2 · i? · no effect size: the entry prints mean post-test scores (16% kinetic energy, 7% momentum) and p < 0.05 · causal · r2
Quasi-experimental comparison of five implementation styles with 200 volunteers randomly assigned among groups (Style 1, N=29, computer-based). Post-test scores of 16% (kinetic energy) and 7% (momentum) were "the lowest of all implemen- tations in the two studies."
"students of the computer-based implementation had statistically lower ( p < 0.05) post- test scores for the momentum questions when compared to any other style in the present study as well as the ideal implementation of the tutorials in the previous study."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Media comparison studies produce uninterpretable "no significant difference" findings. — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- The computer-based implementation showed no significant difference from individual paper-based work with brief written answers — related: consistent, not opposite (that comparison group, individual paper-based work, came from the prior study and is not one of the styles this entry reports it lower than)
- For novel material (impulse-momentum theorem), no statistical difference emerges among group-based styles with verbal TA interaction; the tutorial material itself dominates — related
- For material students have prior knowledge of (work-energy theorem), tutorial effectiveness depends significantly on teaching quality, with the ideal Socratic implementation best — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
computer-based-tutorial-implementation-lowest-posttest |
title |
A computer-based implementation of the tutorial yields the lowest post-test scores, statistically lower on momentum than every other style in the same study and the prior study's ideal implementation |
description |
A computer-based implementation of the tutorial yields the lowest post-test scores, statistically lower on momentum than every other style in the same study and the prior study's ideal implementation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — slezak-2011 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.