The computer-based implementation showed no significant difference from individual paper-based work with brief written answers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Despite more complete onscreen feedback at checkpoints, the computer-based implementation produced no significant differences in understanding of kinetic energy or momentum compared with students working individually through paper tutorials with brief written answers (p = 0.64 and p = 0.40). → Slezak 2011
Evidence¶
Slezak 2011¶
Slezak, C., Koenig, K. M., Endorf, R. J., & Braun, G. A. (2011). Investigating the Effectiveness of the Tutorials in Introductory Physics in Multiple Instructional Settings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0050 doi:10.48550/arxiv.1110.0050
q2 · i? · no effect size: the entry prints only p = 0.64 and p = 0.40 for a non-significant difference · causal · r2
Comparison of the computer-based group (N=29) with the prior study's individual paper-based group (N=76). The authors had hypothesized richer checkpoint feedback would raise scores; equivalence was not tested, only no significant difference found.
"we found no significant differences in student understanding of kinetic energy or momentum (p = 0 .64 and p = 0 .40, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Media comparison studies produce uninterpretable "no significant difference" findings. — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Detailed written answer keys at checkpoints significantly improved momentum post-test scores over brief answers, but not kinetic energy scores — related
- A computer-based implementation of the tutorial yields the lowest post-test scores, statistically lower on momentum than every other style in the same study and the prior study's ideal implementation — related
- For novel material (impulse-momentum theorem), no statistical difference emerges among group-based styles with verbal TA interaction; the tutorial material itself dominates — related
- Students in computer-based inquiry environments still held misconceptions about force and energy after instruction — related
- For material students have prior knowledge of (work-energy theorem), tutorial effectiveness depends significantly on teaching quality, with the ideal Socratic implementation best — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
computer-based-no-better-than-individual-paper |
title |
The computer-based implementation showed no significant difference from individual paper-based work with brief written answers |
description |
The computer-based implementation showed no significant difference from individual paper-based work with brief written answers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — slezak-2011 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.