Concept attainment model did not show significant influence on student learning achievement compared to drill skill model¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The concept attainment model did not show a significant influence on student learning achievement when compared to the drill skill learning model. → Wenno et al. 2016

Evidence¶

Wenno et al. 2016¶

Izaak Hendrik Wenno, Pieter Wattimena, Luky Maspaitela. (2016). Comparative Study between Drill Skill and Concept Attainment Model towards Physics Learning Achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol.5, No.3. http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r1

In the quasi-experimental comparison, the concept attainment group's post-test results showed 46.7% of students still in the fail category. The authors state the model "do not show a significant influence on student learning achievement, when compared to the drill skill learning model".

"It do not show a significant influence on student learning achievement, when compared to the drill skill learning model."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Drill skill model produces higher physics learning achievement than concept attainment model in Indonesian junior high school students — reports the opposite
• Initial physics ability differed between the two experimental groups before treatment — related
• Concept attainment model instruction yields higher adjusted physics concept understanding scores than traditional method — related