Claims

Experimental and control 7th-grade students did not differ significantly on achievement pre-test scores before the particulate nature of matter unit

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There was no significant difference between experimental and control group pre-test achievement scores, indicating comparable starting achievement. → Ceylan 2018

Evidence

Ceylan 2018

Ceylan, Ö., & Yiğit, E. A. (2018). Analyzing the Effect of Concept Cartoon Usage on Students’ Cognitive Structures Developments and Science Achievements through Flow Maps. Science Education International, 29(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1205414

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Mann–Whitney U comparison of achievement pre-test scores in the semi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group study (n = 27 per group). The study found "no significant difference" between groups (U = 320.00, ρ > 0.05); equivalence was not tested beyond this non-significant test.

"there was no significant difference between the control group and the experimental group students’ average of achievement pre-test scores (U = 320.00, ρ > 0.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.