Claims

Seventh-grade students taught the particulate nature of matter unit with concept cartoons achieved significantly higher post-test scores than control students taught with the current program

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental group post-test achievement scores were significantly higher than control group scores after 8 weeks of concept cartoon instruction. → Ceylan 2018

Evidence

Ceylan 2018

Ceylan, Ö., & Yiğit, E. A. (2018). Analyzing the Effect of Concept Cartoon Usage on Students’ Cognitive Structures Developments and Science Achievements through Flow Maps. Science Education International, 29(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1205414

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Mann–Whitney U-test on achievement post-test scores in the semi-experimental pre-test/post-test design (27 experimental, 27 control). Mean ranks (34.41 vs 17.59) show the experimental group higher, supporting that "the teaching with concept cartoons was effective in enhancing the success of teaching."

"it is seen that there is a significant difference (U = 97.00, ρ < 0.05) between the achievement test scores of the students of the experimental group and the control group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.