Concept-mapping effects are larger in low- and middle-income countries (g = 1.053) than high-income countries (g = 0.626)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries yielded significantly larger effect sizes than those in high-income countries, a difference unaffected by the influential studies. → Dimitris Anastasiou · Clare Nangsin Wirngo · Pantelis Bagos 2024

Evidence¶

Dimitris Anastasiou · Clare Nangsin Wirngo · Pantelis Bagos 2024¶

Dimitris Anastasiou · Clare Nangsin Wirngo · Pantelis Bagos. (2024). The Effectiveness of Concept Maps on Students' Achievement in Science: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09877-y

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis of country economic level (World Bank classification) across 20 low/middle-income and 38 high-income comparisons; the difference persisted after excluding the two influential studies.

"the effect size from studies conducted in high-income countries is significantly smaller than those from low- and middle-income countries (g = 0.626 vs. 1.053); this difference in effect sizes was not affected by the two aforementioned influential studies"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Learning deficits are appreciably larger in middle-income countries than in high-income countries, with no evidence available from low-income countries — related
• Estimated learning deficits are smaller in European studies than in studies from the rest of the world — related