Structural relations exist between students' conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Among PBL psychology students, conceptions of constructivist learning showed structural relationships with regulation and processing strategies as measured by both the ILS and MSLQ. → Loyens 2008
Evidence¶
Loyens 2008¶
Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Relationships between students' conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9065-6
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Structural equation modelling with 98 third- and fourth-year psychology students in a problem-based curriculum; two hypothesized models (ILS and MSLQ variables) both fit, implying that "structural relations exist between instructional conceptions of a constructivist learning environment and regulation and processing strategies."
"Altogether, these findings imply that structural relations exist between instructional conceptions of a constructivist learning environment and regulation and processing strategies."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Conceptions of motivation to learn relate positively to self-regulation and external regulation and negatively to lack of regulation
- Conceptions of knowledge construction showed no significant relationships with students' reported regulation strategies — reports the opposite
- A three-tiered conceptual-controlling-operational structure is fully valid for MSLQ variables but only partially for ILS variables — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Structural relations exist between students' conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies, and doubting students risk inadequate regulation — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Students who doubt their own learning capacity are at risk of adopting an inadequate lack-of-regulation strategy — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A three-tiered conceptual-controlling-operational structure is fully valid for MSLQ variables but only partially for ILS variables — related
- Conceptions of self-regulated learning had small, non-significant relationships with actual reported self-regulation activities — related
- Studies since 2004 confirm strong interrelations among processing strategies, regulation strategies, conceptions, and motivations of learning patterns — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students' conceptions of self-regulated learning can diverge from their reported self-regulated learning activities — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
conceptions-constructivist-learning-relate-to-regulation-processing |
title |
Structural relations exist between students' conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies |
description |
Structural relations exist between students' conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — loyens-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.