Studies since 2004 confirm strong interrelations among processing strategies, regulation strategies, conceptions, and motivations of learning patterns¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? New-sample studies confirm the interrelations among processing and regulation strategies, learning conceptions, and learning orientations that form the core of the learning patterns model. → Jan D. Vermunt & Vincent Donche 2017
Evidence¶
Jan D. Vermunt & Vincent Donche 2017¶
Jan D. Vermunt & Vincent Donche. (2017). A Learning Patterns Perspective on Student Learning in Higher Education: State of the Art and Moving Forward. Educ Psychol Rev 29:269–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6
q2 · i? · review · r3
Narrative review of studies since 2004 in new samples (e.g., Loyens et al. 2008; Heikkilä et al. 2011; Richardson 2010; Law and Meyer 2011b; Gulpinar 2014). The review reports these studies "confirm the strong interrelations" among the model's components, including in non-Western samples.
"Overall, they confirm the strong interrelations between students'processing and regulations strategies, learning conceptions, and learning motivations that form the core of the learning patterns model"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learning patterns are associated with personal factors (personality, motivation, beliefs, prior education, age, gender); their associations with personality are weak to moderate, indicating learning patterns are not stable traits — related
- Conceptions of motivation to learn relate positively to self-regulation and external regulation and negatively to lack of regulation — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Students who doubt their own learning capacity are at risk of adopting an inadequate lack-of-regulation strategy — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Structural relations exist between students' conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies, and doubting students risk inadequate regulation — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Structural relations exist between students' conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Review of 23 ILS studies since 2004 finds more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered — related
- Four learning patterns (meaning-, reproduction-, application-, and undirected) form a replicable factor structure in first-year higher education students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
learning-pattern-components-interrelated |
title |
Studies since 2004 confirm strong interrelations among processing strategies, regulation strategies, conceptions, and motivations of learning patterns |
description |
Studies since 2004 confirm strong interrelations among processing strategies, regulation strategies, conceptions, and motivations of learning patterns |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jan-d-vermunt-vincent-donche-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.