Meaning negotiation and appropriation are mechanisms for achieving conceptual change in scientific thinking¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 1994 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Within a sociocultural framework informed by conversation analysis, meaning negotiation and appropriation are identified as the mechanisms by which conceptual change in scientific thinking is achieved. → Roy D. Pea 1994

Evidence¶

Roy D. Pea 1994¶

Roy D. Pea. (1994). Learning Scientific Concepts Through Material and Social Activities: Conversational Analysis Meets Conceptual Change. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), pp.265-277. https://telearn.hal.science/hal-00190572

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Theoretical argument in the article's abstract: the author describes a sociocultural framework informed by conversation analysis in which "meaning negotiation and appropriation are identified as mechanisms for achieving such conceptual change." No empirical data or effect size is reported; the support is the theoretical argument itself.

"A sociocultural framework informed by studies of conversation analysis is described, in which meaning negotiation and appropriation are identified as mechanisms for achieving such conceptual change."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The ontogenesis of conceptual change in scientific thinking serves as a central case for examining situated cultural learning — a broader claim this one bears on
• Teachers report AI tools foster collaborative, socially constructed learning through shared data and critical negotiation of AI outputs — related