Claims

Conditioning results from multiple disengagement detection methods on response times shows how the conditional approach aids threshold setting and misclassification avoidance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The study conditions results from a variety of detection methods used to identify disengaged survey responses on response times. → Soland 2018 q2 i? The conditional approach may be useful in identifying where to set response time thresholds for survey items and in avoiding misclassification when using other detection methods. → Soland 2018

Evidence

Soland 2018

Soland, J., Wise, S., & Gao, L. (2018). Identifying disengaged survey responses: New evidence using response time metadata. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(2), 151-165. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/identifying-disengaged-survey-responses-new-evidence-using-response-time-metadata/ doi:10.1080/08957347.2019.1577244

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The abstract describes the study's method and use case: results from "a variety of detection methods" are conditioned on response times, showing how the approach may help set response time thresholds for survey items and avoid misclassification. No effect sizes or statistics are printed in the supplied text.

"In this study, we condition results from a variety of detection methods used to identify disengaged survey responses on response times. We then show how this conditional approach may be useful in identifying where to set response time thresholds for survey items, as well as in avoiding misclassification when using other detection methods."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id conditioning-detection-methods-on-response-times
title Conditioning results from multiple disengagement detection methods on response times shows how the conditional approach aids threshold setting and misclassification avoidance
description Conditioning results from multiple disengagement detection methods on response times shows how the conditional approach aids threshold setting and misclassification avoidance
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
recheck_by 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — soland-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.