Claims

Validating decision rules for detecting disengaged survey responses is problematic because surveys have no correct answers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Unlike on achievement tests, surveys have no correct answers, so validating decision rules for detecting disengaged responses is problematic. → Soland 2018

Evidence

Soland 2018

Soland, J., Wise, S., & Gao, L. (2018). Identifying disengaged survey responses: New evidence using response time metadata. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(2), 151-165. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/identifying-disengaged-survey-responses-new-evidence-using-response-time-metadata/ doi:10.1080/08957347.2019.1577244

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The abstract states a validation problem: "unlike on achievement tests, there are no correct answers," and consequently "validating decision rules for detection methods is problematic." This is the study's stated rationale rather than a tested result.

"One major disadvantage when trying to detect disengaged responses on surveys is that, unlike on achievement tests, there are no correct answers. As a result, validating decision rules for detection methods is problematic."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id survey-disengagement-detection-validation-problem
title Validating decision rules for detecting disengaged survey responses is problematic because surveys have no correct answers
description Validating decision rules for detecting disengaged survey responses is problematic because surveys have no correct answers
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
recheck_by 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — soland-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.