The experimental group's conflict level increased by 6.4 points (20%), which the authors interpret as greater readiness to resist asocial actions rather than heightened interpersonal conflict¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the experimental group the average conflict score increased by 6.4 points (20%, from 20.3 to 13.9 on a scale where fewer points mean more conflict), while the control group's level practically did not change. → Nagovitsyn et al. 2018 q2 i? Qualitative analysis indicated the conflict increase was due to attitude to violations of social norms, not personal mood, and no respondent reached the critical low-conflict level. → Nagovitsyn et al. 2018 (2)

Evidence¶

Nagovitsyn et al. 2018¶

Roman S. Nagovitsyn, Dana K. Bartosh, Aleksandr Y. Ratsimor, Yuri G. Maksimov. (2018). Formation of Social Tolerance Among Future Teachers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.754

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Rogov 'Are you a conflict person?' test results (Table 5) in the 72-student experiment; EG moved from 20.3 to 13.9 points (Wilcoxon Temp = 1, p<0.01), CG from 18.9 to 19.5 (Temp = 160, p<0.01).

"In the course of experimental work, it was found that in the EG the average level of conflict increased by 6.4 points, which is 20 %."

Nagovitsyn et al. 2018 (2)¶

Roman S. Nagovitsyn, Dana K. Bartosh, Aleksandr Y. Ratsimor, Yuri G. Maksimov. (2018). Formation of Social Tolerance Among Future Teachers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.754

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative analysis of the conflict test reported by the authors; they state no respondent reached the critical low-conflict level and that moral qualities rose simultaneously, so the increase toward negative phenomena is read as a positive result.

"the conflict has increased due to the attitude to violations of social norms, and not due to perso nal mood, living conditions"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Observed motivation indicators predict student-teacher conflict but not closeness: less persistence, greater task competence, and more interest/arousal predict greater conflict — related
• An interactive-methods scheme for forming social tolerance raised the tolerance index of future teachers by 34% in the experimental group versus 5% in the control group — related