An interactive-methods scheme for forming social tolerance raised the tolerance index of future teachers by 34% in the experimental group versus 5% in the control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After the formative experiment, the experimental group's tolerance index rose from 8.7 to 11.7 points (34%) while the control group rose from 8.5 to 8.9 points (5%), with Wilcoxon T-test differences significant at p<0.01 in both groups. → Nagovitsyn et al. 2018

Evidence¶

Nagovitsyn et al. 2018¶

Roman S. Nagovitsyn, Dana K. Bartosh, Aleksandr Y. Ratsimor, Yuri G. Maksimov. (2018). Formation of Social Tolerance Among Future Teachers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.754

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental semester study of 72 future-teaching students (36 experimental, 36 control) using the Intol test; the article reports "increased by 34 %" in the experimental group versus 5% in the control group, with Wilcoxon T-test reliability at p<0.01.

"The index of tolerance in the EG was 11.7 points – increased by 34 %, and in the CG it was 8.9 points – increased by 5 % (Table 1)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The proportion of experimental-group students at a high tolerance level increased by 165% during the formative experiment — related
• The experimental group's conflict level increased by 6.4 points (20%), which the authors interpret as greater readiness to resist asocial actions rather than heightened interpersonal conflict — related
• Experimental-group students improved on all four measured prosocial-tolerance qualities, with the largest gain in courage in upholding position (~20%) and the smallest in independence (~10%) — related
• Ranks of ethical and individualistic values rose in the experimental group but changed little in the control group — related