Conflict trajectory classes predict grade 6 achievement: chronic high-stable conflict shows the worst underachievement, rising conflict coincides with underachievement, but declining conflict does not¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Boys with high-stable conflict trajectories had much lower grade 6 achievement than the other conflict subgroups, after controlling for grade 1 achievement, IQ, and externalizing behavior. → Spilt 2012
q3 i? Children with low-increasing conflict trajectories performed significantly worse than the low-stable and high-declining groups, while high-declining and low-stable groups did not differ. → Spilt 2012
Evidence¶
Spilt 2012¶
Spilt, J. L., Hughes, J. N., Wu, J.-Y., & Kwok, O.-M. (2012). Dynamics of Teacher-Student Relationships: Stability and Change across Elementary School and the Influence on Children's Academic Success. Child Development, 83(4), 1180-1195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01761.x
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Prediction of Achievement analysis (Results): Time 6 achievement residualized on grade 1 IQ, externalizing behavior, and achievement, then compared across conflict trajectory classes with the Fisher LSD test (p ≤.05; one-tailed); significant class differences emerged for boys and girls.
"For boys, the subgroup with high-stable patterns had much lower Achievement scores than the other subgroups. Children with low-increasing trajectories performed significantly worse than the low-stable and high-declining groups. Children with high-declining patterns did not differ from children with low-stable patterns."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The probability of school failure increases as a function of the timing and length of children's exposure to relational adversity — a broader claim this one bears on
- Teacher-student conflict follows distinct longitudinal trajectory classes across elementary school, including low-stable, low-increasing, high-declining, and (for boys only) high-stable patterns — related
- Trajectory patterns of teacher-student warmth and conflict differ between boys and girls, with a high-stable conflict class found only for boys — related
- Low warmth trajectories predict lower achievement gains for boys but not for girls — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
conflict-trajectories-predict-achievement |
title |
Conflict trajectory classes predict grade 6 achievement: chronic high-stable conflict shows the worst underachievement, rising conflict coincides with underachievement, but declining conflict does not |
description |
Conflict trajectory classes predict grade 6 achievement: chronic high-stable conflict shows the worst underachievement, rising conflict coincides with underachievement, but declining conflict does not |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — spilt-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.