Low warmth trajectories predict lower achievement gains for boys but not for girls¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Boys in the low-increasing warmth trajectory obtained substantially lower achievement scores than boys in the high-declining warmth trajectory; warmth trajectory classes did not predict girls' achievement gains. → Spilt 2012
Evidence¶
Spilt 2012¶
Spilt, J. L., Hughes, J. N., Wu, J.-Y., & Kwok, O.-M. (2012). Dynamics of Teacher-Student Relationships: Stability and Change across Elementary School and the Influence on Children's Academic Success. Child Development, 83(4), 1180-1195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01761.x
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Prediction of Achievement analysis (Results) using residualized Time 6 achievement: a gender-specific effect, with boys' warmth trajectory classes predicting achievement but girls' warmth classes showing no prediction of gains.
"Boys with low-increasing levels of Warmth obtained substantially lower Achievement scores than boys following a high-declining trajectory (Table 2). Trajectory classes of Warmth did not predict girls' gains in Achievement."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Adverse Experiences — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Gender — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- Conflict trajectory classes predict grade 6 achievement: chronic high-stable conflict shows the worst underachievement, rising conflict coincides with underachievement, but declining conflict does not — related
- Teacher-student conflict follows distinct longitudinal trajectory classes across elementary school, including low-stable, low-increasing, high-declining, and (for boys only) high-stable patterns — related
- Trajectory patterns of teacher-student warmth and conflict differ between boys and girls, with a high-stable conflict class found only for boys — related
- Children with early behavioral, academic, and demographic risks are over-represented in adverse teacher-student relationship trajectories — related
- Teacher-reported warmth follows two trajectory classes per gender: a normative high-declining class and a low-increasing class starting from lower warmth — related
- Gender is unevenly distributed across participation profiles: boys are overrepresented among disconnected and girls among diligent students
- Prosocial behavior, aggression, and peer relationships are stratified along gender, ethnoracial, and socioeconomic lines — related
- The probability of school failure increases as a function of the timing and length of children's exposure to relational adversity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
warmth-trajectories-boys-not-girls |
title |
Low warmth trajectories predict lower achievement gains for boys but not for girls |
description |
Low warmth trajectories predict lower achievement gains for boys but not for girls |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — spilt-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.