In educational learning, prior-knowledge congruency enhances associative memory for indirectly inferred BC-associations in both experiments¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Congruent BC-associations were recalled better than incongruent ones (experiment 1 associative recall, Cohen's d = 1.05). → Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren 2018
q3 i3 Experiment 2 replicated the congruency benefit on associative recall (Cohen's d = 1.50). → Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren 2018¶
Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren, Lydia Krabbendam and Martijn Meeter (2018). Integrating educational knowledge: reactivation of prior knowledge during educational learning enhances memory integration. npj Science of Learning 3:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0027-8
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Paired t-test in Table 1 of experiment 1 (21 analysed participants) comparing congruent vs incongruent associative recall of the inferred BC-association; congruent mean 60.01% vs incongruent 41.98%, "4.83 <.001 1.05", Cohen's d = 1.05 — a large significant congruency effect.
"Associative recall (%) 60.01 (.21) 41.98 (.22) 4.83 <.001 1.05 [.10, .26]"
Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren 2018 (2)¶
Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren, Lydia Krabbendam and Martijn Meeter (2018). Integrating educational knowledge: reactivation of prior knowledge during educational learning enhances memory integration. npj Science of Learning 3:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0027-8
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Paired t-test row in Table 1 for experiment 2 (23 analysed participants) associative recall; congruent mean 62.16% vs incongruent 40.52%, "7.17 <.001 1.50", Cohen's d = 1.50. The congruency benefit on inferred BC-memory replicated with a larger effect.
"Associative recall (%) 62.16 (.13) 40.52 (.18) 7.17 <.001 1.50 [.15, .28]"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Subjective reactivation of the prior-knowledge item during new learning enhances associative recall for inferred associations, for congruent and incongruent items alike — related
- Congruency enhanced item recognition of new descriptions in experiment 2 but not in experiment 1 — related
- Reading goal × congruency interaction on memory: study goal improves memory for congruent but not incongruent targets — related
- Congruent mental reinstatement of the learning context enhanced short-delay recall transfer in a non-VR setting, regardless of learning-context group — related
- Congruent new information is better remembered, though strongly surprising incongruent information can also be learned well — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
congruency-enhances-associative-recall-educational |
title |
In educational learning, prior-knowledge congruency enhances associative memory for indirectly inferred BC-associations in both experiments |
description |
In educational learning, prior-knowledge congruency enhances associative memory for indirectly inferred BC-associations in both experiments |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — marlieke-tina-renée-van-kesteren-2018, marlieke-tina-renée-van-kesteren-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.