Subjective reactivation of the prior-knowledge item during new learning enhances associative recall for inferred associations, for congruent and incongruent items alike¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 In experiment 1, stronger reported B-reactivation predicted better associative recall (η² = .41). → Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren 2018
q3 i3 Experiment 2 replicated the reactivation effect on associative recall (η² = .58). → Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren 2018¶
Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren, Lydia Krabbendam and Martijn Meeter (2018). Integrating educational knowledge: reactivation of prior knowledge during educational learning enhances memory integration. npj Science of Learning 3:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0027-8
q3 · i3 · causal · r1
Repeated-measures ANOVA on experiment 1 associative recall with congruency and reactivation factors; the reactivation main effect "reactivation: F(2,24) = 8.16, P = .002, η2 = .41" — a large effect (η² = .41). Participants rated reactivation strength as strong, a bit, or none.
"congruency: F(1,12) = 9.87, P = .009, η2 = .45 reactivation: F(2,24) = 8.16, P = .002, η2 = .41; congruency x reactivation: F < 1"
Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren 2018 (2)¶
Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren, Lydia Krabbendam and Martijn Meeter (2018). Integrating educational knowledge: reactivation of prior knowledge during educational learning enhances memory integration. npj Science of Learning 3:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0027-8
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Experiment 2 repeated-measures ANOVA on associative recall; the reactivation main effect "Greenhouse-Geisser F(1.36,21.69) = 22.24, P < .001, η2 = .58" (large, η² = .58) replicates experiment 1's reactivation benefit for inferred BC-memory.
"reactivation: Greenhouse-Geisser F(1.36,21.69) = 22.24, P < .001, η2 = .58; congruency x reactivation: F < 1"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In educational learning, prior-knowledge congruency enhances associative memory for indirectly inferred BC-associations in both experiments — related
- Congruency and reactivation affect associative memory independently, with no congruency × reactivation interaction in either experiment — related
- Subjective reactivation predicted item recognition of new descriptions in experiment 1, but this effect did not appear in experiment 2 — related
- Congruent new information is better remembered, though strongly surprising incongruent information can also be learned well — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
subjective-reactivation-enhances-associative-recall |
title |
Subjective reactivation of the prior-knowledge item during new learning enhances associative recall for inferred associations, for congruent and incongruent items alike |
description |
Subjective reactivation of the prior-knowledge item during new learning enhances associative recall for inferred associations, for congruent and incongruent items alike |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — marlieke-tina-renée-van-kesteren-2018, marlieke-tina-renée-van-kesteren-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.