Conscientiousness is positively related to the number of textual annotation acts¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i1 Conscientiousness correlates positively with the number of textual annotation acts (r = 0.182). → Omheni 2017

Evidence¶

Omheni 2017¶

Omheni, N., Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., & Hadj Kacem, A. (2017). Computing of Learner’s Personality Traits Based on Digital Annotations. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27, 241-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0124-x

q2 · i1 · associational · r1

Correlational analysis of 120 volunteers; Table 1 reports NTAA–conscientiousness Pearson r = 0.182, significant at p < 0.05.

"Conscientiousness is positively related to the number of textual annotation act (Fig. 2). The rest of the correlation values are not considered because of p-value > 0.05."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Personality Traits — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Digital annotation traces can predict conscientiousness and neuroticism scores with reasonable accuracy — a broader claim this one bears on
• Extraversion is negatively correlated with the average number of annotation acts — related
• Bland-Altman analysis shows small bias between i-Read and NEO-IPIP scores for conscientiousness (−0.72) and neuroticism (1.29) — related