Claims

A 93-hour content-intensive math PD program improved fourth-grade teachers' math content knowledge

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q4
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? Treatment teachers' knowledge scores were 7 points higher than control teachers' in fall and 6 points higher in spring, implying movement from the 50th to the 74th (fall) and 71st (spring) percentile. → Garet 2016

Evidence

Garet 2016

Garet, M. S., Heppen, J. B., Walters, K., Parkinson, J., Smith, T. M., Song, M., Garrett, R., Yang, R., & Borman, G. D. (2016). Focusing on teachers' mathematical knowledge: The impact of content-intensive professional development (NCEE 2016-4010). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20164010

q4 · i? · causal · r2

Randomized experiment: grade 4 teachers from 94 schools randomly assigned within schools; final sample 165 teachers from 73 schools. Knowledge assessed with an adaptive NWEA-based test in fall 2013 and spring 2014; impacts statistically significant at the 0.05 level. The study reports "7 points higher" in fall and 6 in spring; no standardized effect size is printed.

"Treatment teachers' average knowledge score was 7 points higher than control teachers' average score in the fall and 6 points higher in the spring ( Figure 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.