Claims

The 93-hour PD was implemented with high fidelity and high teacher participation, creating a 95-hour contrast in math-related PD versus control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2–r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? On average 96 percent of the expected 80 hours of Intel Math and 100 percent of planned Mathematics Learning Community and Video Feedback Cycle hours were delivered. → Garet 2016 q3 i? Treatment teachers participated in more than 90 percent of implemented hours for each component and received 95 more hours of math-related PD than control teachers. → Garet 2016 (2)

Evidence

Garet 2016

Garet, M. S., Heppen, J. B., Walters, K., Parkinson, J., Smith, T. M., Song, M., Garrett, R., Yang, R., & Borman, G. D. (2016). Focusing on mathematical knowledge: The impact of content-intensive teacher professional development, executive summary (NCEE 2016-4009). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Descriptive implementation analysis using activity logs, attendance records, and video recordings of all group sessions coded for activities and MQI quality.

"All three components of the PD were implemented with high fidelity. On average, 96 percent of the expected 80 hours of Intel Math, and 100 percent of the planned Mathematics Learning Community and Video Feedback Cycle hours were delivered"

Garet 2016 (2)

Garet, M. S., Heppen, J. B., Walters, K., Parkinson, J., Smith, T. M., Song, M., Garrett, R., Yang, R., & Borman, G. D. (2016). Focusing on mathematical knowledge: The impact of content-intensive teacher professional development, executive summary (NCEE 2016-4009). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive comparison of self-reported math-related PD during the study year; reported focus differences on K–8 math content and student thinking were statistically significant, ranging from 0.7 to 1.3 on a 4-point survey scale.

"Overall, treatment teachers participated in 95 more hours of math-related PD than did control teachers, which is close to the approximately 93 hours of math PD provided by the study"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.