Claims

During feedback provision, both content-specific support (g = 0.48) and generic support (g = 0.55) positively affect peer-feedback processes and outcomes, with no significant difference between them

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · quant-synthesis r? · q4 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i2 Content-specific support during feedback provision has a positive effect vs. no support (g = 0.48). → Hornstein 2025 q4 i2 Generic support during feedback provision has a positive effect vs. no support (g = 0.55). → Hornstein 2025 (2) q4 i? The effect sizes of content-specific and generic support during feedback provision do not differ significantly from each other (F(1, 3.84) = 0.14, p = 0.72). → Hornstein 2025 (3)

Evidence

Hornstein 2025

Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025). Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3

q4 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of 20 studies (k = 99 effect sizes) for content-specific support during feedback provision: g = 0.48, 95% CI [0.09, 0.87], p < 0.05 (Table 3).

"Regarding RQ3b, we found small to medium-sized positive effects for content-specific and generic support during the feedback provision phase compared to peer-feedback without instructional support during the feedback provision phase."

Hornstein 2025 (2)

Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025). Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3

q4 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of 13 studies (k = 79 effect sizes) for generic support during feedback provision: g = 0.55, 95% CI [0.26, 0.83], p < 0.01 (Table 3).

"Regarding RQ3b, we found small to medium-sized positive effects for content-specific and generic support during the feedback provision phase compared to peer-feedback without instructional support during the feedback provision phase."

Hornstein 2025 (3)

Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025). Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-regression comparison of content-specific vs. generic support effects during feedback provision found no significant difference (F(1, 3.84) = 0.14, p = 0.72).

"the effects regarding the comparisons between content-specific support during peer-feedback and peer-feedback without instructional support on the one hand and generic support during peer-feedback and peer-feedback without instructional support on the other hand were not significantly different from each other during the feedback provision phase (F(1, 3.84) = 0.14, p = 0.72)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id content-specific-and-generic-provision-support-both-effective
title During feedback provision, both content-specific support (g = 0.48) and generic support (g = 0.55) positively affect peer-feedback processes and outcomes, with no significant difference between them
description During feedback provision, both content-specific support (g = 0.48) and generic support (g = 0.55) positively affect peer-feedback processes and outcomes, with no significant difference between them
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — hornstein-2025, hornstein-2025-2, hornstein-2025-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.