Claims

Feedback provision support improves quality of feedback provision (g = 0.72) and quality of feedback reception (g = 0.69) but not subject-matter-related knowledge

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q4 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 3 of 3 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i2 Feedback provision support has a medium-sized positive effect on the quality of feedback provision (g = 0.72). → Hornstein 2025 q4 i2 Feedback provision support has a medium-sized positive effect on the quality of feedback reception (g = 0.69). → Hornstein 2025 (2) q4 i? Feedback provision support shows no significant effect on subject-matter-related knowledge (g = 0.43, p = 0.06). → Hornstein 2025 (3)

Evidence

Hornstein 2025

Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025). Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3

q4 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 18 studies (k = 92 effect sizes) for feedback provision support on quality of feedback provision: g = 0.72, 95% CI [0.32, 1.12], p < 0.01 (Table 4).

"Regarding RQ4, our analyses revealed small to medium-sized positive effects of feedback provision support on the quality of feedback provision and on the quality of feedback reception. For subject-matter-related knowledge, we did not find a significant effect of feedback provision support"

Hornstein 2025 (2)

Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025). Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3

q4 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of 16 studies (k = 32 effect sizes) for feedback provision support on quality of feedback reception: g = 0.69, 95% CI [0.12, 1.25], p < 0.05 (Table 4).

"Regarding RQ4, our analyses revealed small to medium-sized positive effects of feedback provision support on the quality of feedback provision and on the quality of feedback reception. For subject-matter-related knowledge, we did not find a significant effect of feedback provision support"

Hornstein 2025 (3)

Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025). Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of 15 studies (k = 54 effect sizes) for feedback provision support on subject-matter-related knowledge: g = 0.43, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.88], p = 0.06 — not significant (Table 4).

"Regarding RQ4, our analyses revealed small to medium-sized positive effects of feedback provision support on the quality of feedback provision and on the quality of feedback reception. For subject-matter-related knowledge, we did not find a significant effect of feedback provision support"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id provision-support-improves-both-process-qualities
title Feedback provision support improves quality of feedback provision (g = 0.72) and quality of feedback reception (g = 0.69) but not subject-matter-related knowledge
description Feedback provision support improves quality of feedback provision (g = 0.72) and quality of feedback reception (g = 0.69) but not subject-matter-related knowledge
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — hornstein-2025, hornstein-2025-2, hornstein-2025-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.