The four analytic approaches differ systematically in study contexts and designs¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Unimodal and horizontal approaches rely on large samples in authentic higher education with individual tasks, while vertical approaches use smaller samples and diverse streams for collaborative secondary-education tasks. → Susanne de Mooij 2025

Evidence¶

Susanne de Mooij 2025¶

Susanne de Mooij, Joni Lämsä, Lyn Lim, Olli Aksela, Shruti Athavale, Inti Bistolfi, Flora Jin, Tongguang Li, Roger Azevedo, Maria Bannert, Dragan Gašević, Sanna Järvelä, Inge Molenaar. (2025). A Systematic Review of Self-Regulated Learning through Integration of Multimodal Data and Artificial Intelligence. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10028-0

q2 · i? · review · r3

Epistemic network analysis (ENA Web Tool version 1.7.0) of coded study characteristics across the four approaches. The review summarises that unimodal and horizontal studies feature large samples (many over 100 participants) in authentic higher education, integrated studies typically have fewer than 50 participants, and all approaches were more often conducted in authentic than laboratory settings.

"the unimodal and horizontal approaches predominantly rely on large sample sizes and focus on individual learning in higher education, whereas the vertical approach often uses smaller samples and diverse data streams for collaborative learning tasks in secondary education."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Multimodal SRL research shows a historical shift from unimodal toward integrated analytical designs, but motivational and affective dimensions remain underrepresented — a broader claim this one bears on
• SRL research shows a historical shift from unimodal approaches toward integrated multimodal approaches — related