SRL research shows a historical shift from unimodal approaches toward integrated multimodal approaches¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The percentage of studies using an integrated approach grew from 13.8% (2010–2016) to 28.4% (2017–2023), while unimodal approaches declined from 37.9% to 25.4%. → Susanne de Mooij 2025

Evidence¶

Susanne de Mooij 2025¶

Susanne de Mooij, Joni Lämsä, Lyn Lim, Olli Aksela, Shruti Athavale, Inti Bistolfi, Flora Jin, Tongguang Li, Roger Azevedo, Maria Bannert, Dragan Gašević, Sanna Järvelä, Inge Molenaar. (2025). A Systematic Review of Self-Regulated Learning through Integration of Multimodal Data and Artificial Intelligence. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10028-0

q2 · i? · review · r2

Systematic review of 142 studies coded by approach and publication year. The review reports the integrated approach "growing from 4 studies (13.8%) in earlier years to 29 studies (28.4%) more recently", with unimodal approaches declining from 37.9% to 25.4% over the same periods.

"A significant development across the years is the increased use of an integrated approach in SRL research, growing from 4 studies (13.8%) in earlier years to 29 studies (28.4%) more recently."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The four analytic approaches differ systematically in study contexts and designs — related
• Standard descriptive statistics dominate SRL multimodal analysis even in integrated approaches — related
• Multimodal SRL research shows a historical shift from unimodal toward integrated analytical designs, but motivational and affective dimensions remain underrepresented — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)