Claims

Grade VIII students taught with a contextual learning model show higher increases in self-confidence than students taught with expository learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The increase in self-confidence of students who obtained the contextual learning model is higher than that of students who received expository learning, per a two-way ANOVA on the self-confidence scale gain. → Surya 2017

Evidence

Surya 2017

Surya, E., Putri, F.A., & Mukhtar. (2017). Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability and Self-Confidence of High School Students through Contextual Learning Model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85-94. https://jme.ejournal.ums.ac.id/index.php/jme

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Same quasi-experimental study; gain on the self-confidence scale was compared between the experimental (contextual) and control (expository) classes by two-way ANOVA. The article reports "calculated F value of 4.864 and 4.020 table F value", so the learning factor was significant.

"Based on Table 5 shown that the learning factor obtained calculated F value of 4.864 and 4.020 table F value. Because the value of F count is greater than the value of F table then H 0 and H 1 accepted."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.