Claims

Contiguity principles: near placement and simultaneous presentation of corresponding words and pictures improve transfer

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2008 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In 5 of 5 tests, learners who received integrated presentations (words near corresponding graphics) performed better on transfer tests than students who received separated presentations, effect size 1.12. → Richard E. Mayer 2008 q3 i3 In 8 of 8 experiments, learners performed better on transfer questions with simultaneous rather than successive presentation of animation and narration, median d = 1.31. → Richard E. Mayer 2008 (2)

Evidence

Richard E. Mayer 2008

Richard E. Mayer. (2008). Applying the Science of Learning: Evidence-Based Principles for the Design of Multimedia Instruction. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.8.760

q3 · i3 · review · r2

Controlled experiments comparing integrated versus separated page layouts for paper-based brakes and lightning lessons and computer-based lightning lessons; the article reports the quoted 5-of-5 result and that "The effect size was 1.12, which is a large effect."

"In 5 of 5 tests, involving paper-based lessons on brakes and lightning and computer-based lessons on lightning, learners who received integrated presentations performed better on transfer tests than did students who received separated presentations"

Richard E. Mayer 2008 (2)

Richard E. Mayer. (2008). Applying the Science of Learning: Evidence-Based Principles for the Design of Multimedia Instruction. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.8.760

q3 · i3 · theoretical · r3

Controlled experiments comparing simultaneous versus successive presentation of narration and animation on pumps, brakes, lungs, and lightning; the article reports the quoted 8-of-8 result and that "The median effect size was 1.31, which is considered a large effect."

"in 8 out of 8 experiments involving computer-based lessons on pumps, brakes, lungs, and lightning, learners performed better on answering transfer questions when they received simultaneous presentation of animation and narration rather than successive presentation"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id contiguity-principles-mayer-2008
title Contiguity principles: near placement and simultaneous presentation of corresponding words and pictures improve transfer
description Contiguity principles: near placement and simultaneous presentation of corresponding words and pictures improve transfer
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2008
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — richard-e-mayer-2008, richard-e-mayer-2008-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.