Claims

Higher levels of contingent support were related to higher appreciation of support, regardless of measurement occasion or independent working time

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The main effect of contingency on appreciation of support was significant (small effect size), with no interaction with occasion or independent working time. → van de Pol 2015

Evidence

van de Pol 2015

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Multilevel analysis of the appreciation-of-support questionnaire (Cronbach's a = .90) in the experimental classroom study; the article reports "only the main effect of contingency was significant (small effect size of R 2 = .04)" and higher contingency related to higher appreciation.

"For students’ appreciation of support, only the main effect of contingency was significant (small effect size of R 2 = .04; Cohen 1992). Regardless of the measurement occasion or the independent working time, higher levels of contingency were related to higher appreciation of support"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id contingency-relates-to-appreciation-of-support
title Higher levels of contingent support were related to higher appreciation of support, regardless of measurement occasion or independent working time
description Higher levels of contingent support were related to higher appreciation of support, regardless of measurement occasion or independent working time
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-de-pol-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.