A unilateral grading contract guarantees students a course grade of B based solely on completion of specified activities, not on judged writing quality¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2009 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Students earn a B entirely on conscientious effort and participation in the contract's listed activities, with the grade independent of the teacher's judgment of writing quality. → Danielewicz 2009
Evidence¶
Danielewicz 2009¶
Danielewicz, Jane and Peter Elbow. (2009). A Unilateral Grading Contract to Improve Learning and Teaching. College Composition and Communication 61(2). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14394/23309
q1 · i? · design · r1
The authors' description of the central provision of the contract they use in first-year writing courses: "you earn the grade of B entirely on the basis of what you do", with higher grades resting on judged quality. No empirical data are reported; this is the authors' account of their own practice.
"Thus you earn the grade of B entirely on the basis of what you do—on your conscientious effort and participation. The grade of B does not derive from my judgment about the quality of your writing."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The authors report that fourteen weeks of contract-required work improves writing quality enough to warrant a B — related
- The hybrid grading contract helps resist grade inflation by reserving grades above B for exceptionally high quality — related
- Two writing teachers report that decoupling evaluation from grades under a grading contract lets them give blunter feedback that students can weigh, an account with no data reported — related
- Contract grading yields more total work from students, especially skilled writers who previously skipped learning tasks — related
- Transcript grades are a blurred currency of performance information, partly due to grade inflation driven by student pressure — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
contract-guarantees-b-for-completion-not-quality |
title |
A unilateral grading contract guarantees students a course grade of B based solely on completion of specified activities, not on judged writing quality |
description |
A unilateral grading contract guarantees students a course grade of B based solely on completion of specified activities, not on judged writing quality |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-14 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — danielewicz-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.