Participants deprived of relevant relational knowledge in Stage 1 take longer on the subsequent network-reasoning task¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 The control condition, which completed an unrelated Stage 1 task, took significantly longer to complete Stage 2 than the comparable no-genAI, no-incentive experimental condition. → Dawid Ratajczyk 2026
Evidence¶
Dawid Ratajczyk 2026¶
Dawid Ratajczyk, Agata Dymarska, Adam Matłoka, Michał Tomczyk, Małgorzata Wiącek. (2026). Thinking With AI, Reasoning Without It: Cognitive Offloading to Generative AI Weakens Effort Regulation. Preprint. https://osf.io/59qtm/ doi:10.31234/osf.io/83jum_v1
q3 · i3 · causal · r3
Stage 2 completion-time comparison between the control condition (different Stage 1 knowledge network, no genAI) and the comparable experimental condition in the lab experiment, tested with a Mann–Whitney U test; the quoted effect size is r rb = −.380.
"The control group also took significantly longer to complete Stage 2 than the comparable experimental condition (no-genAI, no-incentives;𝑈= 435.00,𝑝=.005,𝑟 rb = −.380)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Performance incentives increase time invested in the assisted reasoning task — related
- Prior genAI access shows only exploratory evidence of poorer subsequent unaided reasoning, within the no-incentive condition, and no preregistered main effect — related
- GenAI use weakens effort adjustment to incentives on subsequent unaided reasoning — related
- Both hint conditions took more time-on-task than control, but ChatGPT and human tutor conditions did not differ in session time — related
- Adaptive-condition students complete the posttest in significantly less time than Control students — related
- Access to an LLM assistant during practice did not significantly lower subsequent unaided test performance — related
- Prior genAI use and incentives show no clear effects on later memory retention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
control-condition-slower-network-reasoning |
title |
Participants deprived of relevant relational knowledge in Stage 1 take longer on the subsequent network-reasoning task |
description |
Participants deprived of relevant relational knowledge in Stage 1 take longer on the subsequent network-reasoning task |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — dawid-ratajczyk-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.