Claims

Prior genAI use and incentives show no clear effects on later memory retention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 Neither prior genAI access nor incentives significantly affected Stage 3 memory-test accuracy, with negligible printed effect sizes. → Dawid Ratajczyk 2026

Evidence

Dawid Ratajczyk 2026

Dawid Ratajczyk, Agata Dymarska, Adam Matłoka, Michał Tomczyk, Małgorzata Wiącek. (2026). Thinking With AI, Reasoning Without It: Cognitive Offloading to Generative AI Weakens Effort Regulation. Preprint. https://osf.io/59qtm/ doi:10.31234/osf.io/83jum_v1

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Preregistered 2×2 ANOVA on the 10-item Stage 3 memory test in the lab experiment; overall memory performance was M = 57.5% (SD = 17.6%). The quoted tests show negligible effects (η²p = .001 and η²p < .001), providing no support for H3.

"There was no significant main effect of prior genAI access (𝐹(1,153) = 0.095,𝑝=.758,𝜂 2 𝑝 =.001) and no significant main effect of incentives (𝐹(1,153) = 0.022,𝑝=.882,𝜂 2 𝑝 < .001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id genai-no-clear-memory-effect
title Prior genAI use and incentives show no clear effects on later memory retention
description Prior genAI use and incentives show no clear effects on later memory retention
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dawid-ratajczyk-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.