Claims

The no-captions control group also improved significantly in listening comprehension over the treatment period

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The no-captions group showed a statistically significant pre-test to post-test increase, indicating improvement without caption support. → Behroozizad and Majidi 2015

Evidence

Behroozizad and Majidi 2015

Sorayya Behroozizad, Sudabeh Majidi. (2015). The Effect of Different Modes of English Captioning on EFL learners' General Listening Comprehension: Full text Vs. Keyword Captions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 6(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.115

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Paired sample t-test for the no-captions control group (n=15), Table 2. The paired-difference mean was -12.33333 with a significance value of .000, indicating a significant pre-to-post increase; the printed post-test mean was 33.86.

"Pair 3 Listening Pretest for No-text group - Listening Posttest for No-text group -12.33333 6.29815 1.62617 -15.82113 -8.84554 -7.584 14 .000"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.