Captioning mode significantly affected listening comprehension, with full captions outperforming keyword captions and both outperforming no captions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? One-way ANOVA found significant differences among full-caption, keyword-caption, and no-caption groups on listening post-test scores. → Behroozizad and Majidi 2015
q3 i? Scheffé post hoc comparisons showed the full-captions group outperformed the keyword-captions group, and both significantly outperformed the no-captions group. → Behroozizad and Majidi 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Behroozizad and Majidi 2015¶
Sorayya Behroozizad, Sudabeh Majidi. (2015). The Effect of Different Modes of English Captioning on EFL learners' General Listening Comprehension: Full text Vs. Keyword Captions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 6(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.115
q3 · i? · causal · r2
One-way ANOVA on the three groups' listening post-test scores (n=45 total). Post-test means were 45.86 (full), 38.13 (keyword), and 33.86 (no captions); the omnibus test was significant, F (2, 42) = 103.51, p<.01.
"Table 4, clearly indicated that the difference between the means of the three groups was statistically significant. F (2, 42) = 103.51, p<.01."
Behroozizad and Majidi 2015 (2)¶
Sorayya Behroozizad, Sudabeh Majidi. (2015). The Effect of Different Modes of English Captioning on EFL learners' General Listening Comprehension: Full text Vs. Keyword Captions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 6(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.115
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Scheffé post hoc multiple range test on post-test scores. The full-text group exceeded the keyword group by a mean difference of 7.73333 and the no-text group by 12.00000, both significant at the 0.05 level.
"According to Table5, the full captions group performed better than the keyword captions group and both of them significantly higher than the no-captions group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Keyword captions significantly improved EFL learners' general listening comprehension from pre-test to post-test — related
- Providing captions of any type improved general listening comprehension of EFL students compared with no captions — related
- Full captions significantly improved EFL learners' general listening comprehension from pre-test to post-test — related
- The no-captions control group also improved significantly in listening comprehension over the treatment period — related
- The four groups were homogeneous in general English proficiency before treatment (placement-test ANOVA sig .881) — related
- Viewing captioned instructional videos significantly improves EFL learners' overall language proficiency compared to viewing without captions. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.