The control group taught with the conventional method showed no changes in the learning environment on the integrative collaboration criteria¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the control group, where the model was not used, only very minimal changes occurred across the four criteria between the beginning and end of the experiment. → NataÔja van Gejeka 2013

Evidence¶

NataÔja van Gejeka 2013¶

NataÔja van Gejeka. (2013). Research into Learning Process in a Vocational Secondary School in the Context of Sustainable Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2013-0012

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Control group (22 learners) taught traditionally, observed before and after the semester with the same structured observation instrument; results in Table 5. The article states there were "no changes" and separately that only very minimal changes occurred; no effect size is printed.

"Simultaneously, evaluating the criteria of learnersí integrative collaboration (working in a team, mutual learning, business communication and creative action), there were no changes in the learning environment in the control group with a conventional teaching method, where the method of integrative collaboration was not used."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The integrated approach produced significantly greater critical thinking skill improvement than the conventional method at both universities — related