Claims

The integrated approach produced significantly greater critical thinking skill improvement than the conventional method at both universities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 The Pre-Post × Group interaction was significant (F = 186.02, p = .000, η2 = .718), with experimental improvements of 7.92 at UP and 5.07 at UB versus 1.29 and .57 for controls. → Yimwilai 2015

Evidence

Yimwilai 2015

Supaporn Yimwilai. (2015). An Integrated Approach to Teaching Literature in an EFL Classroom. English Language Teaching, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n2p14

q2 · i3 · causal · r1

Three-way ANOVA with one repeated measure on pretest/posttest critical thinking scores of 78 students in four groups (N = 24/24/15/15). The Pre-Post * Group interaction was significant with η2 = .718; Table 5 reports experimental improvements of 7.92 (UP) and 5.07 (UB) versus 1.29 and .57 for controls, each significantly higher.

"Pre-Post * Group 1 279.23 279.23 186.02 .000 .718"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.