Claims

Control-group students taught with the current curriculum showed no significant change in classroom engagement from pre-test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Wilcoxon Sign Test comparisons of the control group's pre-test and post-test scores found no significant difference on any of the five engagement sub-dimensions. → Ayçiçek 2018

Evidence

Ayçiçek 2018

Ayçiçek, B., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2018). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Students’ Classroom Engagement in Teaching English. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 385-398. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11226a

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Wilcoxon Sign Test on the 20-student control group's pre-test and post-test scores in the same quasi-experiment. The article reports p values from .096 to .417 across the five sub-dimensions and states "there is no significant di fference between the pre -test and post -test scores of the control group".

"The data given in Table 5 show that there is no significant di fference between the pre -test and post -test scores of the control group in the five sub -dimensions (p>.05). In the light of the data given in Table 5, it can be argued that students’ classroom engagement levels did not change during the experimental process."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.