Claims

The control group's pre-test to post-test difference in Mathematics achievement was not statistically significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group moved from a pre-test mean of 51.33 to a post-test mean of 57.67, with a calculated t of 1.42, which the article treats as not significant. → D.R. Robert Joan and S.P. Denisia 2012

Evidence

D.R. Robert Joan and S.P. Denisia 2012

D.R. Robert Joan and S.P. Denisia. (2012). Multimedia Approach and its Effect in Teaching Mathematics for the Prospective Teachers. li-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1101646

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group pre-post comparison for the 30-student control group taught with Active Learning Methodology; the mean rose from 51.33 to 57.67 with a "calculated 't' value (1.42)".

"Table 7 shows that the Mean and Standard Deviation for the pre-test of control group is 51.33 and 18.85 respectively. The Mean and Standard Deviation for the Post- test of control group is 57.67 and 15.54 respectively. Here the calculated 't' value (1.42) was found to be greater than the table value (1.96) at 0.05 level of significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.