Claims

Prospective teachers taught Mathematics with a multimedia package scored significantly higher on the post-test than peers taught with Active Learning Methodology

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group (multimedia) outperformed the control group (Active Learning Methodology) on the post-test, t = 4.66 exceeding the table value 1.96 at the 0.05 level. → D.R. Robert Joan and S.P. Denisia 2012

Evidence

D.R. Robert Joan and S.P. Denisia 2012

D.R. Robert Joan and S.P. Denisia. (2012). Multimedia Approach and its Effect in Teaching Mathematics for the Prospective Teachers. li-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1101646

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Randomized pre-test post-test experiment with 60 prospective teachers in two groups of 30; the multimedia group's post-test mean of 76.80 exceeded the control group's 57.67, and the "calculated 't' value (4.66)" exceeded the 1.96 table value at the 0.05 level.

"Table 6 shows that the Mean and Standard Deviation for the control group (N= 30) is 57.67 and 15.54 respectively. The Mean and Standard Deviation for the experimental group (N=30) is 76.80 and 16.25 respectively. Here the calculated 't' value (4.66) was found to be greater than the table value (1.96) at 0.05 level of significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.