Claims

The control group's grammar scores also increased significantly from pretest to posttest without any error correction session

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group's mean rose from M=44.05 (SD=20.47) on the pretest to M=49.14 (SD=17.70) on the posttest, a significant paired difference (t=-2.840, df=34, p=.008). → Karaazmak 2018

Evidence

Karaazmak 2018

Fulda Karaazmak. (2018). The Effects of a Grammar Error Correction Session on Language Learners' Success. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 10(1), 61–70. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1207240

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired samples t-test within the control group (n=35), which received no treatment, comparing pretest and posttest grammar scores; the article reports a significant difference with t=-2.840, df=34, p=.008. No effect size is printed.

"Table 3 shows that there is a significant difference ( p.008<.05) between the mean test scores of control group for pretest ( M=44.05, SD=20.47) and the posttest ( M=49.14, SD=17.70)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.