Claims

Simulation-response convergence was corroborated by survey-based changes in mindsets and practices and by human rater ratings for Roster Justice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The shift in simulation responses was corroborated by LE participants expressing more equity-oriented mindsets and describing more equity-promoting practices on immediate postcourse and follow-up surveys. → Littenberg-Tobias 2021 q2 i? For Roster Justice, LE participants whose responses were most similar topically with HE participants were also more likely to be rated as equitable by human raters. → Littenberg-Tobias 2021 (2)

Evidence

Littenberg-Tobias 2021

Littenberg-Tobias, J., Borneman, E., & Reich, J. (2021). Measuring Equity-Promoting Behaviors in Digital Teaching Simulations: A Topic Modeling Approach. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211045685

q2 · i? · design · r2

Survey corroboration of the simulation-response convergence among LE participants, using paired comparisons of composite equity mindset and equity-promoting practice scores at immediate postcourse and follow-up; the abstract prints effect sizes of 0.88 SD and 0.32 SD respectively.

"This shift was corroborated by LE participants also expressing more equity-oriented mindsets and described engaging in more equity-promoting practices on surveys (both immediate postcourse and follow-up)."

Littenberg-Tobias 2021 (2)

Littenberg-Tobias, J., Borneman, E., & Reich, J. (2021). Measuring Equity-Promoting Behaviors in Digital Teaching Simulations: A Topic Modeling Approach. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211045685

q2 · i? · design · r2

Human-rater validation for Roster Justice only: research assistants rated responses on a 5-point Avoidant-Aware rubric (weighted Krippendorff's alpha 0.76, 25% double-rated), blind to the distance measure. Topical similarity to HE participants was associated with more equitable ratings.

"Additionally, for one of the simulations, Roster Justice, we found that LE participants whose responses were most similar topically with HE participants were also more likely to be rated as equitable by human raters."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id convergence-corroborated-by-surveys-and-human-raters
title Simulation-response convergence was corroborated by survey-based changes in mindsets and practices and by human rater ratings for Roster Justice
description Simulation-response convergence was corroborated by survey-based changes in mindsets and practices and by human rater ratings for Roster Justice
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
recheck_by 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — littenberg-tobias-2021, littenberg-tobias-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.