Claims

Under cooperative learning instruction, there was no statistically significant gender difference in trigonometry achievement, though female students scored higher on average

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Female students exposed to cooperative learning had a higher mean achievement score (23.3) than male students (20.5), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.789). → T. D. Bot & John E. Eze 2016

Evidence

T. D. Bot & John E. Eze 2016

T. D. Bot & John E. Eze. (2016). Effects of concept mapping and cooperative learning strategies on senior secondary school students' achievement in trigonometry in Kano state, Nigeria. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 56-66. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107765

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Within the cooperative learning group (Table 6: 37 males, 33 females), females' mean gain of 5.20 exceeded males' 3.80, but Table 7 ANCOVA gives gender F = 0.20, p = 0.789 — "no statistical significant mean difference"; equivalence was not tested.

"the p‐value of 0.789 based on gender (males and females) in achievement in trigonometry from the use of cooperative learning strategy is strictly greater than α=0.05. This shows that there is no statistical significant mean difference in the achievement of the students in trigonometry based on gender"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.