Cooperative learning has a medium positive effect (0.89) on vocational high school students' mathematics learning outcomes compared with conventional learning¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Across 22 studies, the random-effects summary effect size for cooperative versus conventional learning on VHS mathematics outcomes is 0.89 [0.70; 1.07], a medium effect. → M. Rais Ridwan 2022

Evidence¶

M. Rais Ridwan 2022¶

M. Rais Ridwan, Samsul Hadi, Jailani Jailani. (2022). A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of a cooperative learning model on vocational high school students' mathematics learning outcomes. Participatory Educational Research, 9(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.97.9.4

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of 22 quasi-experimental studies (cooperative experimental class vs conventional control class) using forest plot analysis in JASP. The summary effect size was "0.89 [0.70; 1.07]", with estimated z-value 9.59 and p-value <0.001 (Table 4).

"The forest plot also shows the summary impact size of 0.89 [0.70; 1.07], demonstrating that learning utilising the cooperative paradigm is thriving on the mathematics learning outcomes of VHS students."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Cooperative learning is more effective for grade 11 than grade 10 vocational high school mathematics students — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Cooperative learning produces a medium, positive, significant effect on mathematics achievement compared with traditional methods (d++ = 0.59) — related
• Cooperative learning is more effective in classes of 1-30 students than in classes of more than 30 students — related
• The 22 included studies are heterogeneous, requiring a random-effects model — related
• Estimated cooperative learning efficacy is higher in studies published in SINTA and GARUDA indexed journals (1.04) than in Google Scholar indexed articles or proceedings (0.73) — related
• No publication bias is detected in the meta-analysis by rank correlation, regression, Fail-Safe N, and Trim and Fill checks — related
• Innovative learning is more effective than conventional learning for junior high school students' mathematical problem-solving ability (summary effect 0.95, 95% CI 0.71–1.19) — related