Students answered questions requiring coordination of two or more representations less accurately than questions answerable from a single representation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Accuracy on Question #4, which required coordination of two or more representations, was lowest among the three scored question types. → Mike Stieff 2011
q3 i? Accuracy differed between question types, and Question #4 was significantly lower than Questions #2 and #3 collapsed, per Scheffé post-hoc test. → Mike Stieff 2011 (2)
Evidence¶
Mike Stieff 2011¶
Mike Stieff, Mary Hegarty, Ghislain Deslongchamps. (2011). Identifying Representational Competence with Multi-Representational Displays. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.507318
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Descriptive accuracy data from the problem-solving interview of ten organic chemistry undergraduates across three animations. Question #4 accuracy was lowest: "student accuracy was the lowest (M = 1.2, SD = .97)".
"For Question #4, which required the coordination of two or more representations, student accuracy was the lowest (M = 1.2, SD = .97)."
Mike Stieff 2011 (2)¶
Mike Stieff, Mary Hegarty, Ghislain Deslongchamps. (2011). Identifying Representational Competence with Multi-Representational Displays. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.507318
q3 · i? · associational · r1
ANOVA over the nine scored interview questions of the ten-participant interview study. "A one-way analysis of variance showed that the accuracy rate differed between the questions, F(2,26) = 7.04, p < .05."
"A one-way analysis of variance showed that the accuracy rate differed between the questions, F(2,26) = 7.04, p < .05, and a post-hoc analysis using the Scheffé test indicated that the average number of correct responses to Question #4 was significantly lower"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The Multimodal Interference Effect: mapping visual representations to physical concepts degrades LLM performance even on non-visual problem aspects — related
- Multiple representations improve learning — related
- Students were reasonably accurate overall across the nine scored interview questions (M = 6.17, SD = 2.12), with accuracy varying by question type — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
coordination-of-two-representations-correctless |
title |
Students answered questions requiring coordination of two or more representations less accurately than questions answerable from a single representation |
description |
Students answered questions requiring coordination of two or more representations less accurately than questions answerable from a single representation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — mike-stieff-2011, mike-stieff-2011-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.