Students were reasonably accurate overall across the nine scored interview questions (M = 6.17, SD = 2.12), with accuracy varying by question type¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Across the nine scored questions of the interview, overall accuracy was reasonably high (M = 6.17, SD = 2.12), though accuracy was non-uniform across questions. → Mike Stieff 2011

Evidence¶

Mike Stieff 2011¶

Mike Stieff, Mary Hegarty, Ghislain Deslongchamps. (2011). Identifying Representational Competence with Multi-Representational Displays. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.507318

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Binary-scored accuracy data from the ten-participant problem-solving interview, scored with a rubric established by an organic chemistry instructor. "students were reasonably accurate in their responses to the nine questions (M = 6.17, SD = 2.12)".

"Overall, students were reasonably accurate in their responses to the nine questions (M = 6.17, SD = 2.12). Accuracy of specific questions across all three animations was non-uniform."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students answered questions requiring coordination of two or more representations less accurately than questions answerable from a single representation — related
• The automated scoring system's agreement with human raters varied widely by dimension, with information fidelity showing a weak, non-significant correlation — related
• Younger students solve letter equations less accurately than number equations, but this difference disappears by age 16–17 — related
• Participants answered the VISIGARP inspection exercises with high accuracy (M = 94.3%) — related