Coupling effects are limited to contiguous waves and do not generalize across subjects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Student-teacher coupling showed no predictive effect on score changes at lags of 1 to 4 waves. → Xiaomeng Xu 2026
q2 i? Cross-subject analyses found no significant effects in either direction, indicating subject-specific coupling dynamics. → Xiaomeng Xu 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Xiaomeng Xu 2026¶
Xiaomeng Xu, Dan Zhang & Yu Zhang. (2026). Student teacher inter brain coupling forecast cross semester academic fluctuation in real world classrooms. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00421-x
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Lag analysis forecasting Δscores at lags from 0 to 4 waves in the longitudinal dataset; only lag-0 results were significant and displayed. The authors interpret this as coupling influence being limited to contiguous academic terms.
"The results suggests that student -teacher coupling does not have a predictive effect on subsequent changes in academic performance."
Xiaomeng Xu 2026 (2)¶
Xiaomeng Xu, Dan Zhang & Yu Zhang. (2026). Student teacher inter brain coupling forecast cross semester academic fluctuation in real world classrooms. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00421-x
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Cross-subject analysis using Chinese-class TI to predict math performance and vice versa, under both dynamic and static models. No significant effects emerged in either direction, suggesting coupling effects "reflect subject-specific dynamics of classroom interaction."
"As shown in Figure S5, no significant effects were found in either direction."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Within-student increases in high-beta student-teacher inter-brain coupling predict subsequent improvement in both Chinese and math scores — reports the opposite
- Static same-wave student-teacher inter-brain coupling is negatively associated with concurrent math performance — related
- Peer-based inter-brain coupling predicts math improvement only via class-average coupling and shows subject-specific static patterns — related
- The coupling-performance relationship differs across baseline achievement groups — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
coupling-effects-contiguous-subject-specific |
title |
Coupling effects are limited to contiguous waves and do not generalize across subjects |
description |
Coupling effects are limited to contiguous waves and do not generalize across subjects |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — xiaomeng-xu-2026, xiaomeng-xu-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.